Thursday, September 29, 2011

thoughts on Spiritualist churches

Strengths
  • The only evidence-based religion.
  • A proven link with Spirit, keeping the message and inspiration relevant
  • No reliance on outdated and legend-based theology
  • Universalist and non-sectarian outlook
  • Modern, inclusive and socially-progressive philosophy with no anti-women or anti-gay teachings
  • National network of over 500 churches: SNU 336, GW 52, US 28, Corinthians ?, Unaffiliated ?
  • Large population of enthusiastic, skilled and talented volunteers
Weaknesses
  • Movement is stuck in ‘messages’ groove
  • General standards of mediumship not what joiners have been led (unrealistically?) to expect
  • Failure to promote philosophy as interestingly and accessibly as it should be
  • Larger number of leavers than joiners over past 21 years(4)
  • Inability to retain joiners for very long.
  • Untrained leadership at church level
  • Church network erratically spaced, based on serendipity rather than strategic planning
  • Small size of congregations and churches,  making it difficult to offer an interesting and comprehensive range of activities, or to minister to the whole person
  • Lack of in-depth leadership at all levels (too many ‘elected unopposed’)
  • Too much bureaucracy – too little creativity
Opportunities
  • Retain many more from the large numbers we attract
  • Create a new model of Spiritualist church or centre
  • Retain the large number of joiners we attract with the natural mediums that are out there
  • Appeal to family audience with Lyceums alongside Sunday morning services
  • Multi-media advertising, using small press ads to direct prospects to website articles, setting out our stall more fully and cheaply than ever before.
  • To replace declining Christianity as the natural religion for modern humankind
Threats
  • Exposure of a ‘super medium’, bringing our easy recruitment advantage to a halt, whilst accelerating the leavers’ rate
  • Possibility of bad publicity and unfair media coverage
  • Our own exponents’ limitations being spread by word of mouth
  • Legislation (unlikely at present)
  • Our own inaction due to failure to recognise our present vulnerability
  • SNU’s bureaucratic culture could kill the creativity necessary to transform it

Followers